M11 - TERJEMAHAN VIDEO (6)
6. Definisi Operasional & Organisasi Kajian (bab
1) # JomTulisTesis
Bab 1 seterusnya, kita
pergi 1.8 iaitu definisi operasional. Ok ini agak sukar ye, kadang-kadang
pelajar ni dia agak keliru. Operasional bermakna tentang definisi kajian yang
kita jalankan. Bukan definisi konsep, bukanlah definisi macam contoh pelajar
buat, apa makna wacana, 1. Apa makna skrip 1, tekstual 1, animasi 1, cerita 1, rakyat
1, Melayu 1. Itu salah ya, kita bukan nak definisi itu. Kalau definisi tiap-tiap
satu, pelajar akan rujuk kamus dewan sahaja dan semua jenis kamus. Jangan! Jadi
operasional ialah tentang kajian kita. Biasanya definisi operasional ini
minimum 2 dan paling maksimum 3, tentang bagaimana kita nak jalankan kajian ini
supaya bila pembaca baca baru faham , ohh ini maksud dia. Jadi kalau kita
tengok tajuk ini, kita boleh ambil 1 wacana tekstual, lagi 1 skrip animasi
cerita rakyat Melayu. Kalau kita nak ambil bezakan skrip animasi tiada kaitan
pula. Jadi kita boleh teruskan, untuk tajuk ini mungkin ada dua. Tajuk yang
lain mungkin ada tiga. Kalau kita ambil tajuk daripada kejuruteraan contohnya,
mungkin operasional ada banyak sebab banyak pemboleh ubahnya. Kalau daripada
tesis Sains pun begitu, ada banyak pemboleh ubah yang membolehkan kita membuat
definisi operasional supaya pemeriksa faham apa kaitan itu dengan tesis
tersebut. Kalau kita tengok tesis dalam bentuk ekonomi juga begitu. Ada
banyak pemboleh ubah, mungkin lebih dari
3. Jadi untuk yang ini, kita fokus kepada 2, awak boleh buat begini kemudian
letak contohnya, wacana tekstual tetapi wacana tekstual yang awak nak buat
definisi operasional ini mesti berkaitan dengan kajian. Pastikan bahawa ambil
dan perlu ada rujukan. Ada satu cara, 1 maknanya awak buat wacana tekstual,
berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Wacana tekstual yang berfokus kepada skrip
animasi, wacana tekstual ini akan dianalisis dengan menggunakan 3 elemen. Contoh
3 elemen ini iaitu kandungan, konteks dan andaian. Jadi menurut Normaliza Abd
Rahim (2019), wacana tekstual apa dia apa dia, bolehlah ada rujukan dan juga
1.8.2 iaitu skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu. Ini perlulah berkaitan dengan
kajian awak, huraikan serba ringkas. Skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu terdiri
daripada 20 cerita, sebab dalam tesis yang dianalisis 20 cerita. Jadi skrip
animasi ini berbentuk apa dia, huraian. Mungkin yang ini skrip animasi cerita
rakyat Melayu awak huraikan berkaitan dengan kajian kita, tak ada pula rujukan,
tak apa boleh diterima sebab definisi ini berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Jadi
ada 2 cara, satu cara, mempunyai rujukan, ini ada rujukan, ini ada rujukan.
Yang kedua, tiada rujukan, maknanya awak buat huraian. Huraian wacana tekstual
itu dari segi konteks awak punya tesis. Jadi tiada rujukan, dua-dua boleh
diterima. Tetapi macam saya katakan sebelum ini, rujuk penyelia. Kalau penyelia
kata ada rujukan, letak rujukan. Kalau penyelia kata tak apa, saya percaya
kalau tak ada rujukan pun saya faham dan ini sebenarnya tidak perlu rujukan
kerana berkaitan dengan rujukan awak. Pun boleh diterima. Kita berbeza
pendapat, berbeza sekolah jadi different school of taught jadi pemikiran kita
berbeza. Jadi kalau ada 1 juta penyelia, ada 1 juta pemikiran yang berbeza.
Terpulang kepada penyelia. Macam saya
kalau saya kata tak perlu kerana berkaitan dengan kajian bagaimana awak nak
jalankan kajian nama pun operasional, operation. Kalau ada rujukan, pastikan
tidak boleh rujuk kamus. Dah kenapa nak rujuk kamus. Kena rujuk kajian-kajian,
bukan kamus. Menurut Kamus Bahasa Dewan Edisi Keempat, wacana tekstual ialah
blab la bla tak boleh, itu kita pun tahu. Jangan rujuk kamus. Jadi, kita rujuk
kajian daripada orang lain. Satu boleh rujukan, kedua ada rujukan pun boleh
diterima, terpulang kepada penyelia masing-masing. Kalau penyelia kata ada,
terimalah, perlu akur kata penyelia. Jadi kita lihat, kita teruskan iaitu 1.9
iaitu organisasi kajian. Organisasi kajian ini sebenarnya terpulang kepada
individu/pelajar/penyelia. Selalunya saya akan suruh pelajar PhD untuk letak
organisasi kajian, kadang-kadang pelajar Master pun boleh, tak letak pun boleh,
jika perlu. Organisasi kajian ini awak buat dalam bentuk perenggan. Jadi
perenggan pertama, apa ada dalam bab 1, kemudian perenggan kedua apa ada bab 2,
kita nak buat secara ringkas organisasi kita supaya apabila penyelia baca, ohh
bab 1 ada ini rupanya. Penyusunan tesis kita secara teratur, jadi
perenggan-perenggan dalam ringkasan sahaja. Kerana tiap-tiap pengenalan dalam
bab dah katakan dah, tetapi dalam organisasi kajian ini kita kena nyatakanlah
secara ringkas apa yang ada. Pelajar PhD memang saya wajibkan supaya dia
sendiri boleh faham kajian dia tiap-tiap bab. Kalau pelajar Master nak buat
boleh, tak buat pun tak pe. Bacelor pun sama, pelajar Diploma pun tiada masalah
jika nak buat terpulang kepada penyelia. Akhir sekali, 1.10 baru masuk
kesimpulan, semua bab mesti ada kesimpulan. Tidak ada kesimpulan tidak boleh,
kita nak simpulkan apa yang ada dalam bab tersebut. Saya dapati ada tesis yang tidak
ada kesimpulan, tergantung tiba-tiba dah masuk bab 2. Jadi tidak ada
kesinambungan bab 1 dengan bab 2. Macam bab 1 ada bab lain , macam ada entiti
lain pula. Tidak ada kaitan pula dengan bab 2. Kita kena ada kesimpulan,
simpulkan apa yang ada dalam bab 1. Ingat ayat akhir, kita kena letak kaitkan
dengan bab seterusnya iaitu bab 2 akan membincangkan sorotan kajian... barulah
kita lihat ada kesinambungan antara bab 1 dengan bab 2. Serupa juga dengan
bab-bab lain. Akhir kesimpulan mesti nyatakan apa ada dalam bab seterusnya.
Kadang-kadang ada penyelia kata tidak perlu kerana pemikiran berbeza. Bila
berbeza kita redha dan terima. Kita dah habis bab 1, lupa nak cakap halaman.
Berapa halaman bab 1 ya Prof? Halaman bab 1 lebih kurang 8-10 sahaja. Itu yang
saya kata bahaya kerana ada pelajar letak sampai 30 sebab masalah kajian sahaja
sudah 15 halaman. Masalah kajian kita ambil yang betul-betul penting sahaja.
Masalah kajian terlalu panjang lebar bersemangat sangat sampai 15 halaman, dah
jadi salah. Permasalahan kajian fokuskan ikut objektif. Objektif ada 2, 2
perengganlah permasalahan kajian tetapi padat walaupun ringkas. Yang selebihnya
sorotan dan jurang pada bab 2. Paling lebih pun 12, tetapi jangan kurang 8.
Tetapi jangan lebih 15 takut seperti bab 2 sebab pemeriksa akan potong-potong.
Jadi, kita ingat ya dalam bab 1 ini.
TERJEMAHAN BAHASA INGGERIS
6. Definition
of Operational & Study Organization (Chapter 1) #LetsWriteAThesis
Next, in chapter 1 we
go to 1.8 which is the operational definition. Ok this is a bit difficult,
sometimes student is a bit confused. Operational means about the definition of
the study we conduct. Not the definition of the concept, not the definition of
a sample of students do, what the meaning of the passage, 1. What does 1
script, 1 textual, 1 animation, 1 story, 1 people. Its worng, we do not want
that definition. If the definition of each one, students will refer to the
whole dictionary only and all types of dictionaries. Don't! So operational is
about our study. Usually this operational definition is minimum 2 and maximum
3, about how we want to conduct this study so that when the reader just reads,
ohh this is what he means. So if we look at this topic, we can take one of
textual discourse, yet one animation script Malay folklore. If we want to
differentiate the animated script, it has nothing to do. So we can go on, for
this title there may be two. Other titles may have three. If we take a title
from engineering for example, maybe operational there are many reasons for many
variables. Even if it is from a Science thesis, there are many variables that
allow us to make an operational definition so that the examiner understands
what it has to do with the thesis. If we look at the thesis in economic form,
so is it. There are many variables, maybe more than 3. So for this one, we
focus on 2, you can do this then put for example, textual discourse but the
textual discourse you want to make this operational definition must be related
to the study. Make sure that take and there should be a reference. There is one
way, 1 means you create a textual discourse, related to the study you. Textual
discourse that focuses on animated script, this textual discourse will be
analyzed using 3 elements. Examples of these 3 elements are content, context
and assumptions. So according Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), textual discourse
what is it, there may be references
1.8.2 and also the animation script Malay folklore. This should be related to
your study, describe briefly. Malay folklore animation script consists of 20
stories, because the thesis analyzed 20 stories. So this animated script is what
it looks like, description. Perhaps this animation script you describe Malay
folklore related to our study, there was no reference, not acceptable because
the definition of what is related to the review body. So there are 2 ways, one
way, have a reference, this has a reference, this has a reference. Secondly,
there is no reference, it means you make a description. The description of the
textual discourse in terms of the context you have a thesis. So no reference,
both are acceptable. But like I said before, consult a supervisor. If the
supervisor says there is a reference, place a reference. If the supervisor says
it's okay, I believe if there is no reference I understand and this actually
does not need a reference because it is related to your reference. Even
acceptable. We have different opinions, different schools so different schools
of taught so our thoughts are different. So if there are 1 million supervisors,
there are 1 million different thoughts. It is up to the supervisor. Like me if
I say it is not necessary because it is related to the study of how you want to
conduct a name study is operational, operation. If there is a reference, make
sure not to refer to the dictionary. Why do you want to refer to the dictionary.
Refer to the studies, not the dictionary. According to the Fourth Edition Hall
Language Dictionary, textual discourse is.... cannot, that we also know. Do not
refer to the dictionary. So, we refer to studies from others. One can be a
reference, the second there is a reference can be accepted, it depends on the
respective supervisor. If the supervisor says yes, accept, it is necessary to
comply with the supervisor's words. So we see, we proceed to 1.9 which is the
study organization. The organization of this study is actually up to the individual
/ student / supervisor. Often I will ask PhD students to place a study
organization, sometimes even Master students can, not even place, if necessary.
The organization of this study you made in the form of paragraphs. So the first
paragraph, what is in chapter 1, then the second paragraph is what is chapter
2, we want to make briefly our organization so that when the supervisor reads,
ohh chapter 1 there is this apparently. Organize our thesis regularly, so the
paragraphs are in summary only. Because every introduction in the chapter has
already been said, but in the organization of this study we have to state
briefly what is available. PhD student I do compel so that he himself can
understand his study every chapter. If the Master student wants to do it, he
can't do it. Bachelors also, even Diploma students have no problem if they want
to do it to the supervisor. Finally, 1.10 just came to a conclusion, all
chapters must have a conclusion. There is no conclusion cannot, we want to
conclude what is in the chapter. I found that there is a thesis that has no
conclusion, depending on the sudden entry of chapter 2. So there is no
continuation of chapter 1 with chapter 2. Like chapter 1 there is another
chapter, like there is another entity. It has nothing to do with chapter 2. We
have to have a conclusion, summarize what is in chapter 1. Remember the last
sentence, we have to put it in relation to the next chapter which is chapter 2
will discuss the highlights of the study ... then we see there is continuity
between chapter 1 with chapter 2. Similar to the other chapters. The end of the
conclusion must state what is in the next chapter. Sometimes there are
unnecessary word supervisors because of different thoughts. When different we
are satisfied and accept. We finished chapter 1, forgot to talk about the page.
How many pages of chapter 1 is Prof? Chapter 1 pages are about 8-10 only. That
is what I say is dangerous because there are students up to 30 because the
study problem alone is already 15 pages. The problem of the study we take is
really important only. The problem of the study is too long, it is very
enthusiastic up to 15 pages, so it is wrong. The problems of the study focus on
the objectives. The objective is to have 2, 2 paragraphs of the study problem
but concise even concise. The rest are highlights and gaps in chapter 2. At
least 12, but do not be less than 8. But do not be more than 15 afraid like
chapter 2 because the examiner will cut it. So, we have to remember this
chapter 1.
RUJUKAN
Pautan video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bANk-CrrhI&t=11s
SAYA SUDAH SUBSCRIBE!!
No comments:
Post a Comment